We have been walking this road called Homeschooling for almost five years now. Our road has had many twists and turns in it and as a result, I have come to some conclusions that many might consider somewhat radical.
A little background on our homeschooling adventure:
Students:
BG: ESL learner - K-7th grade in China; 7th grade - 9th grade homeschooled
JA : gifted learner - K-3rd grade Public School; 3rd - 8th homeschooled
AT: gifted learner - K-2nd grade Public School; 2nd - 7th homeschooled
TJ: ESL learner - K-2nd grade in China; 4th-6th grade homeschooled
SG: average learner - K-4th grade homeschooled
HJ: challenged learner - K-3rd grade homeschooled
Curriculum's we've used:
Online Charter School using Calvert
Calvert for K
Robinson Curriculum
Eclectic
Radical Idea #1: Don't worry about what your kids are learning until they get to high school
===========================
Yes, I really mean that with two exceptions:
1) Teach them to read - and I have some odd ideas on this one
2) Teach them math (though this may not be as critical as we think)
Kids don't need to learn history, social studies, science, etc in the early years. Why? Because they will have every bit of it again in High School!!! Think about it - what do you remember from elementary school in these subjects? Probably not much. And what you do remember is probably fairly useless in your daily life. (I remember a unit we did on weather and I can name the different types of cloud formations - not that anybody has asked me about them since 5th grade)
When I was first introduced to Robinson Curriculum, I was intrigued by the idea of only teaching Reading, Writing, and Math. Leaving out all of the other subjects didn't sound right, but the more I read Art Robinson's ideas, the more I became convinced he was right. Even this very science oriented engineer agreed that teaching science in the early years really wasn't that important. Why? Because science in the early years only barely scratches the surface. Each year, you scratch the surface a little bit deeper. Why bother? Your child can learn all they need in-depth in high school (or heaven-forbid - college!)
I was talking to JA about this the other day. He said he didn't like science in public school and I asked him why not. He said he didn't understand why he needed to know that rain falls from the sky, runs into a lake/pond, and then evaporates into the sky again. He became convinced that he wasn't good at science (a quote from him before taking the science portion of the standardized test we gave in 6th grade) because he didn't like it. Funny thing is, he has now decided he wants to be a doctor. He is working through a life science curriculum and still isn't convinced that he likes science because of his previous experience.
The same idea applies to history, social studies and all of the other subject areas. This material will be repeated in high school at a level that the kids can really grasp. Focus your (and your child's) efforts and energy learning in high school. This is what they will remember and carry forward in their adult life.
I finally was totally convinced of this idea when I began figuring out what I needed to teach BG for high school. As I looked at the requirements in FL for a HS diploma, I realized that it covers all of the same subjects/topics that many parents stress about in the early years. He hadn't "lost" all those years of learning (even though he was blessed to be in school in China) and I didn't have to cram 12 yrs of school into his brain in four years. I just had to teach him at the high school level.
Also, as I delved into the idea of Credit By Exam for JA, I began to wonder what really differentiates a middle school class from a high school class from a college class. For example, Biology, most schools teach Biology (or Life Science) in middle school, then again in High School, then it is taught in College. What is the difference? I'm not sure. But I imagine if I take a High School Biology class then I will learn the same things I learned in middle school Life Science. Then why bother taking the Life Science class? Just wait until your child is able to handle the high school level material (which may be at an earlier age than "typical" high school students) and teach at that level.
What's interesting is many packaged curriculums these days actually leverage this principle. They use the same base information and just have the younger kids do one thing, the middle school kids something else and the high school kids even more. Why teach the same thing to your kids 3 (or more) different times? Just teach it to them once in high school.
I know, many people will have a hard time accepting this idea because it doesn't fit the norm of what we grew up with in school. I am going to challenge you to really think about this and come to your own conclusions. Besides, that's what homeschooler's do best.
*** One caveat: Some of this doesn't necessarily apply to our challenged learners. I'll address those issues in a later post.